<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1032 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues, allowing depreciation on goodwill, provisions for leave salary, and rural development expenditure. However, decisions were made against the assessee on matters such as adjusting unabsorbed depreciation and adding deferred tax provision to book profits. Several issues were remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration based on past precedents. Penalty proceedings were deemed premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 10:03:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1032 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues, allowing depreciation on goodwill, provisions for leave salary, and rural development expenditure. However, decisions were made against the assessee on matters such as adjusting unabsorbed depreciation and adding deferred tax provision to book profits. Several issues were remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration based on past precedents. Penalty proceedings were deemed premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>