<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 499 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 4,84,73,750/- as a short-term capital loss, determining the transactions as sham and intended for tax evasion. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal on the disallowance under Section 14A, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 8,48,019/- as no exempt income was claimed. The appeal was partly dismissed and partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:58:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 499 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 4,84,73,750/- as a short-term capital loss, determining the transactions as sham and intended for tax evasion. However, the Tribunal allowed the appeal on the disallowance under Section 14A, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 8,48,019/- as no exempt income was claimed. The appeal was partly dismissed and partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>