<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the capital gains arising from the transfer of shares by a Netherlands resident to an Indian company were taxable in India under the India-Netherlands Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The transaction did not qualify as a &quot;reorganization&quot; under the treaty, leading to the capital gains being deemed taxable in India. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the concessional tax rate of 10% under the second proviso to Section 112 of the Income Tax Act. Both the taxability of capital gains and the tax rate issues were decided against the assessee and revenue, respectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2016 06:57:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the capital gains arising from the transfer of shares by a Netherlands resident to an Indian company were taxable in India under the India-Netherlands Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. The transaction did not qualify as a &quot;reorganization&quot; under the treaty, leading to the capital gains being deemed taxable in India. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the concessional tax rate of 10% under the second proviso to Section 112 of the Income Tax Act. Both the taxability of capital gains and the tax rate issues were decided against the assessee and revenue, respectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>