<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 485 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, allowing them the benefit of exemption under relevant notifications amounting to Rs. 26,18,51,089. The court granted ad-interim relief, restraining the respondents from coercively recovering the duty and indicating a likelihood of success for the applicant. The applicant&#039;s ability to reverse the Cenvat credit used for payment was upheld, with the court considering the substantial amount already deposited pending the appeal. A Rule returnable on 1st March, 2016, was issued, providing ad-interim relief in line with the applicant&#039;s request to prevent coercive recovery of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 485 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, allowing them the benefit of exemption under relevant notifications amounting to Rs. 26,18,51,089. The court granted ad-interim relief, restraining the respondents from coercively recovering the duty and indicating a likelihood of success for the applicant. The applicant&#039;s ability to reverse the Cenvat credit used for payment was upheld, with the court considering the substantial amount already deposited pending the appeal. A Rule returnable on 1st March, 2016, was issued, providing ad-interim relief in line with the applicant&#039;s request to prevent coercive recovery of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>