<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1091 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178945</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI as it was filed after the statutory two-year period. The Commissioner (Appeals) lacked authority to condone the delay beyond this period. Consequently, the applicant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:36:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1091 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178945</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI as it was filed after the statutory two-year period. The Commissioner (Appeals) lacked authority to condone the delay beyond this period. Consequently, the applicant&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the stay application was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>