<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 55 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants, a State Government Corporation, are not liable to pay Service Tax on storage charges collected as they are recipients, not providers, of storage services. The demurrage charges were not deemed taxable as they were not for storage of goods owned by the appellants. The appeal was allowed, and penalties imposed were considered unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 55 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellants, a State Government Corporation, are not liable to pay Service Tax on storage charges collected as they are recipients, not providers, of storage services. The demurrage charges were not deemed taxable as they were not for storage of goods owned by the appellants. The appeal was allowed, and penalties imposed were considered unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>