https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178917 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a firm engaged in processing and exporting granite and marble slabs, who sought a refund of Rs. 60 lakhs collected during an investigation by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore. The court found that the amount was collected before determining the actual liability of the petitioner and directed the Commissioner to expedite the proceedings. It was decided that the deposited amount would earn interest at 9% and be refunded if the final order favored the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of due process and preventing illegal collection of amounts by authorities. en-us Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Feb 2016 11:15:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178917 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a firm engaged in processing and exporting granite and marble slabs, who sought a refund of Rs. 60 lakhs collected during an investigation by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore. The court found that the amount was collected before determining the actual liability of the petitioner and directed the Commissioner to expedite the proceedings. It was decided that the deposited amount would earn interest at 9% and be refunded if the final order favored the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of due process and preventing illegal collection of amounts by authorities. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178917