<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1623 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178912</link>
    <description>The Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014 was analysed as permitting the Central Government to regulate exports and imports in public interest under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Paragraphs 6.8 and 6.9 were treated as exceptions to the export-oriented scheme for EOUs, and DTA supplies under Paragraph 6.9(b), including supplies against foreign exchange remittance, were regarded as transactions involving an element of sale and capable of regulation. The prohibition on DTA supplies of marble was upheld as a valid policy measure, supported by concerns over domestic industry, employment, and diversion of imported raw material into the DTA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1623 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178912</link>
      <description>The Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014 was analysed as permitting the Central Government to regulate exports and imports in public interest under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. Paragraphs 6.8 and 6.9 were treated as exceptions to the export-oriented scheme for EOUs, and DTA supplies under Paragraph 6.9(b), including supplies against foreign exchange remittance, were regarded as transactions involving an element of sale and capable of regulation. The prohibition on DTA supplies of marble was upheld as a valid policy measure, supported by concerns over domestic industry, employment, and diversion of imported raw material into the DTA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>