<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 478 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271773</link>
    <description>Customs House Agent licensing rules impose strict duties of non-transferability, due diligence, and compliance with suspension and revocation procedures. The text states that where an enquiry establishes unauthorised use of the licence for consideration, repeated violations, and revenue loss, appellate discretion to modify a revocation order must be exercised in line with the gravity of the misconduct. It further notes that in cases of deliberate, serious, and recurring regulatory breaches, partial restoration or leniency is inappropriate, and full revocation with forfeiture of security deposit is the proper regulatory response.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 478 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271773</link>
      <description>Customs House Agent licensing rules impose strict duties of non-transferability, due diligence, and compliance with suspension and revocation procedures. The text states that where an enquiry establishes unauthorised use of the licence for consideration, repeated violations, and revenue loss, appellate discretion to modify a revocation order must be exercised in line with the gravity of the misconduct. It further notes that in cases of deliberate, serious, and recurring regulatory breaches, partial restoration or leniency is inappropriate, and full revocation with forfeiture of security deposit is the proper regulatory response.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>