<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 457 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271752</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all the assessee&#039;s appeals concerning incorrect tax deduction, penalty imposition, and exemption under section 10(20) for interest payment to Noida Authority. Relying on precedents and the establishment of Noida under the UP Industrial Area Development Act, the Tribunal determined Noida&#039;s eligibility for exemption. The decision aligned with previous rulings, emphasizing that Noida, as a statutory corporation established under the State Act, qualified for exemption from tax withholding on interest payments. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that tax deduction was not mandatory in such cases involving payments to State Authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 457 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271752</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all the assessee&#039;s appeals concerning incorrect tax deduction, penalty imposition, and exemption under section 10(20) for interest payment to Noida Authority. Relying on precedents and the establishment of Noida under the UP Industrial Area Development Act, the Tribunal determined Noida&#039;s eligibility for exemption. The decision aligned with previous rulings, emphasizing that Noida, as a statutory corporation established under the State Act, qualified for exemption from tax withholding on interest payments. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that tax deduction was not mandatory in such cases involving payments to State Authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>