https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178891 The Delhi High Court admitted the appeal and framed substantial questions of law on whether the Tribunal was right in deleting additions relating to alleged remuneration or royalty paid to 100% subsidiaries by applying section 40A(2)(b), section 92 and Article 9 of the treaty, and whether the Assessing Officer was barred from testing the reasonableness and genuineness of the payments merely because RBI permission had been obtained. The matter was accordingly set down for consideration on those questions. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:43:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178891 The Delhi High Court admitted the appeal and framed substantial questions of law on whether the Tribunal was right in deleting additions relating to alleged remuneration or royalty paid to 100% subsidiaries by applying section 40A(2)(b), section 92 and Article 9 of the treaty, and whether the Assessing Officer was barred from testing the reasonableness and genuineness of the payments merely because RBI permission had been obtained. The matter was accordingly set down for consideration on those questions. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178891