<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 868 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178875</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting significant disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer. The expenses claimed as revenue expenditure were upheld, while additions under Section 68 were deleted due to lack of basis. The Tribunal directed the re-computation of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The order was pronounced on 17.05.2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:35:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 868 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178875</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting significant disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer. The expenses claimed as revenue expenditure were upheld, while additions under Section 68 were deleted due to lack of basis. The Tribunal directed the re-computation of interest under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The order was pronounced on 17.05.2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>