<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 690 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178873</link>
    <description>The tribunal clarified that judgments under the Central Excise Act do not necessarily apply to Service Tax matters. It emphasized that penalties for delayed Service Tax payment are not mandatory if the tax and interest are deposited before the show-cause notice. The tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals as the tax and interest were paid before the notice, aligning with precedents and deeming the penalty unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:18:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 690 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178873</link>
      <description>The tribunal clarified that judgments under the Central Excise Act do not necessarily apply to Service Tax matters. It emphasized that penalties for delayed Service Tax payment are not mandatory if the tax and interest are deposited before the show-cause notice. The tribunal ruled in favor of the respondents, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals as the tax and interest were paid before the notice, aligning with precedents and deeming the penalty unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>