<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 565 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178864</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 for reassessment under section 147, dismissing the petition. It found the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment in 1992-93 due to lack of disclosure, justifying the reassessment notice. The court&#039;s observations were tentative, and all contentions remained open, with interim relief extended for four weeks as requested by the petitioner&#039;s counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 12:23:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 565 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178864</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 for reassessment under section 147, dismissing the petition. It found the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment in 1992-93 due to lack of disclosure, justifying the reassessment notice. The court&#039;s observations were tentative, and all contentions remained open, with interim relief extended for four weeks as requested by the petitioner&#039;s counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>