<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 989 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The short-term capital gain was treated as business income due to the nature and frequency of transactions. The disallowances of telephone and motorcar expenses were deemed reasonable and justified. Consequently, both appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 989 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on all issues. The short-term capital gain was treated as business income due to the nature and frequency of transactions. The disallowances of telephone and motorcar expenses were deemed reasonable and justified. Consequently, both appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>