<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1212 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178847</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a 100% Shell-owned company regarding the computation of arm&#039;s length price for international transactions. Disputes arose over the inclusion and exclusion of comparables in the Transfer Pricing analysis. The Tribunal supported the exclusion of certain government-owned companies and those with high related party transactions. After excluding unsuitable comparables, the remaining companies showed an average margin of 8.68%, leading the Tribunal to conclude that the transactions were at arm&#039;s length. As a result, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the Transfer Pricing Adjustments, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:23:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1212 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178847</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of a 100% Shell-owned company regarding the computation of arm&#039;s length price for international transactions. Disputes arose over the inclusion and exclusion of comparables in the Transfer Pricing analysis. The Tribunal supported the exclusion of certain government-owned companies and those with high related party transactions. After excluding unsuitable comparables, the remaining companies showed an average margin of 8.68%, leading the Tribunal to conclude that the transactions were at arm&#039;s length. As a result, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the Transfer Pricing Adjustments, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>