https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178850 An efficacious statutory appeal under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 ordinarily bars writ intervention under Article 226 when reassessment orders are passed after notice and the assessee's participation. Here, the assessing authority had considered the books of account and the petitioner's reply, and no exceptional ground such as breach of natural justice, want of jurisdiction, or challenge to the validity of the statute was established. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the assessee to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Jun 2016 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178850 An efficacious statutory appeal under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 ordinarily bars writ intervention under Article 226 when reassessment orders are passed after notice and the assessee's participation. Here, the assessing authority had considered the books of account and the petitioner's reply, and no exceptional ground such as breach of natural justice, want of jurisdiction, or challenge to the validity of the statute was established. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable and was dismissed, leaving the assessee to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178850