<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 446 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision to reject the refund claim of service tax paid on input services utilized for export services prior to the effective date of the relevant rules and notifications. The Tribunal held that the rules did not specify that they only applied to exports made after their effective dates, citing a previous case and emphasizing that the benefit of the rebate should not be denied based on conditions not explicitly stated in the rules or notifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 446 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision to reject the refund claim of service tax paid on input services utilized for export services prior to the effective date of the relevant rules and notifications. The Tribunal held that the rules did not specify that they only applied to exports made after their effective dates, citing a previous case and emphasizing that the benefit of the rebate should not be denied based on conditions not explicitly stated in the rules or notifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>