<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 419 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271714</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified rental income and service charges as &#039;Business Income&#039;, allowing depreciation on the business center/commercial complex. Property tax, interest, maintenance charges, and miscellaneous income were treated as business income. The cost of property sold was computed based on the actual constructed area. Disallowance under section 14A was restricted to 5% of tax-exempt income. Notional rent was not assessed post-cessation of ownership. Income from property sale was adjusted against the block of assets. Section 50C was deemed inapplicable, interest on borrowed capital was allowed, and depreciation losses could be carried forward. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals, upheld assessee&#039;s objections, and directed reassessment in line with its rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 419 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271714</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified rental income and service charges as &#039;Business Income&#039;, allowing depreciation on the business center/commercial complex. Property tax, interest, maintenance charges, and miscellaneous income were treated as business income. The cost of property sold was computed based on the actual constructed area. Disallowance under section 14A was restricted to 5% of tax-exempt income. Notional rent was not assessed post-cessation of ownership. Income from property sale was adjusted against the block of assets. Section 50C was deemed inapplicable, interest on borrowed capital was allowed, and depreciation losses could be carried forward. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals, upheld assessee&#039;s objections, and directed reassessment in line with its rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>