<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Domestic Law Amendments on Royalties Don&#039;t Affect Double Taxation Treaties: Misinterpretations Don&#039;t Change International Agreements.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27324</link>
    <description>Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) read with DTAA - It is fallacious to assume that any change made to domestic law to rectify a situation of mistaken interpretation can spontaneously further their case in an international treaty. Therefore, mere amendment to Section 9(1)(vi) cannot result in a change - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 11:55:24 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 11:55:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Domestic Law Amendments on Royalties Don&#039;t Affect Double Taxation Treaties: Misinterpretations Don&#039;t Change International Agreements.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27324</link>
      <description>Royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) read with DTAA - It is fallacious to assume that any change made to domestic law to rectify a situation of mistaken interpretation can spontaneously further their case in an international treaty. Therefore, mere amendment to Section 9(1)(vi) cannot result in a change - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 11:55:24 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>