https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2270 CESTAT (Chennai - AT) allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on inputs used in producing bright bars even though the finished goods were not excisable. The Tribunal followed prior CESTAT precedent ruling that where no duty was payable on finished goods, recovery of credit purportedly used to pay such duty cannot be demanded. Having previously accepted that position, the Revenue could not deny the Cenvat credit at this late stage. en-us Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 Sep 2025 11:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2270 CESTAT (Chennai - AT) allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on inputs used in producing bright bars even though the finished goods were not excisable. The Tribunal followed prior CESTAT precedent ruling that where no duty was payable on finished goods, recovery of credit purportedly used to pay such duty cannot be demanded. Having previously accepted that position, the Revenue could not deny the Cenvat credit at this late stage. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2270