<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revision u/s 263: Disallowance of MD Commission and Depreciation Claim on Short-Term Assets Challenged.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27315</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - commission paid to the MD to be disallowed - Even though it has not claimed 100% of the quantum of the value of assets due to the fact that the assets were acquired and utilized less than 180 days, it was eligible for only 50% of the rate of depreciation. Again, it cannot claim the additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:51:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:51:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revision u/s 263: Disallowance of MD Commission and Depreciation Claim on Short-Term Assets Challenged.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27315</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - commission paid to the MD to be disallowed - Even though it has not claimed 100% of the quantum of the value of assets due to the fact that the assets were acquired and utilized less than 180 days, it was eligible for only 50% of the rate of depreciation. Again, it cannot claim the additional depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:51:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=27315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>