<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 449 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178822</link>
    <description>Recovery of a concealed map from the accused&#039;s house, corroborated by police evidence and the panchnama, supported an inference of conscious possession and of having obtained or collected it for a purpose prejudicial to State safety or interests; the statutory presumption under section 3(2) applied, so the finding was upheld. On the construction of section 3(1)(c) of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, the word &quot;secret&quot; qualifies only &quot;official code or pass word&quot; and not the listed items such as a sketch, plan, model, article, note, document or information; secrecy is therefore not an additional requirement for conviction in respect of those materials, and the conviction was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:32:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 449 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178822</link>
      <description>Recovery of a concealed map from the accused&#039;s house, corroborated by police evidence and the panchnama, supported an inference of conscious possession and of having obtained or collected it for a purpose prejudicial to State safety or interests; the statutory presumption under section 3(2) applied, so the finding was upheld. On the construction of section 3(1)(c) of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, the word &quot;secret&quot; qualifies only &quot;official code or pass word&quot; and not the listed items such as a sketch, plan, model, article, note, document or information; secrecy is therefore not an additional requirement for conviction in respect of those materials, and the conviction was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>