<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 74 -  CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the freight incurred in the return transportation of empty cylinders should not be included in the assessable value of goods under Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. Relying on precedent and distinguishing the Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that if onward freight was excluded, return freight should also be excluded. The decision clarified the application of valuation rules and highlighted the significance of past decisions and principles in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 74 -  CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the freight incurred in the return transportation of empty cylinders should not be included in the assessable value of goods under Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. Relying on precedent and distinguishing the Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that if onward freight was excluded, return freight should also be excluded. The decision clarified the application of valuation rules and highlighted the significance of past decisions and principles in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>