<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 130 -  CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of verifying the credit reversal claim before finalizing any demand. The judgment highlights the significance of compliance with Cenvat credit procedures and the need for thorough documentation to support claims of credit reversal before export to ensure a revenue-neutral position for the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 130 -  CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of verifying the credit reversal claim before finalizing any demand. The judgment highlights the significance of compliance with Cenvat credit procedures and the need for thorough documentation to support claims of credit reversal before export to ensure a revenue-neutral position for the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>