<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 943 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178801</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed with the disallowance related to tax deduction and rent payment being overturned. The disallowance of expenses towards police-imposed penalties was upheld as the penalties were deemed to be for violating traffic rules and not legitimate business expenses. The Tribunal followed a Special Bench decision, ruling that disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) applies only to amounts payable as of 31st March, not to those already paid during the previous year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 943 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178801</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed with the disallowance related to tax deduction and rent payment being overturned. The disallowance of expenses towards police-imposed penalties was upheld as the penalties were deemed to be for violating traffic rules and not legitimate business expenses. The Tribunal followed a Special Bench decision, ruling that disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) applies only to amounts payable as of 31st March, not to those already paid during the previous year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>