<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1620 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178797</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2008-09. It directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to limit the transfer pricing adjustment for export sales to Associated Enterprises (AEs) to transactions with AEs only, falling within the safe harbor limit. Notional interest adjustment on outstanding AE debtors was to be deleted if credit terms were equivalent. Labor charges disallowance was remanded for benchmarking against third-party data. Additional depreciation on plant and machinery was disallowed in line with Supreme Court precedent. The discrepancy in closing stock valuation was remanded for verification, and residential telephone expenses disallowance was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1620 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178797</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2006-07 and 2008-09. It directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to limit the transfer pricing adjustment for export sales to Associated Enterprises (AEs) to transactions with AEs only, falling within the safe harbor limit. Notional interest adjustment on outstanding AE debtors was to be deleted if credit terms were equivalent. Labor charges disallowance was remanded for benchmarking against third-party data. Additional depreciation on plant and machinery was disallowed in line with Supreme Court precedent. The discrepancy in closing stock valuation was remanded for verification, and residential telephone expenses disallowance was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>