<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (11) TMI 21 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178778</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision in a breach of contract suit, ruling against the frustration plea raised by the respondent-firm. The Court emphasized that the agreement did not make delivery contingent on external factors beyond the respondent&#039;s control and highlighted the respondent&#039;s ability to fulfill the contract at the time of the alleged breach. The Court found that the doctrine of frustration did not apply in this case and reinstated the trial court&#039;s decree in favor of the appellant, awarding costs throughout.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 14:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (11) TMI 21 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178778</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the High Court&#039;s decision in a breach of contract suit, ruling against the frustration plea raised by the respondent-firm. The Court emphasized that the agreement did not make delivery contingent on external factors beyond the respondent&#039;s control and highlighted the respondent&#039;s ability to fulfill the contract at the time of the alleged breach. The Court found that the doctrine of frustration did not apply in this case and reinstated the trial court&#039;s decree in favor of the appellant, awarding costs throughout.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>