<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1619 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178776</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT JODHPUR upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of consultancy charges and hire charges under section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee based on precedent and legal interpretations, concluding that the payments were reimbursement under agreements and not subject to TDS. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1619 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178776</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT JODHPUR upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision and dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of consultancy charges and hire charges under section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee based on precedent and legal interpretations, concluding that the payments were reimbursement under agreements and not subject to TDS. The department&#039;s appeal was dismissed on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>