<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1184 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178763</link>
    <description>The Tribunal stayed the recovery of Service Tax amount, interest, and penalty for the period in question until the final disposal of the appeal. The decision was in favor of the applicant for the waiver of pre-deposit, considering the debatable nature of whether the tax deducted at source by NHAI should be included in the gross amount for Service Tax liability. The Tribunal noted that the applicant had already paid Service Tax on the billed amount for services rendered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1184 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178763</link>
      <description>The Tribunal stayed the recovery of Service Tax amount, interest, and penalty for the period in question until the final disposal of the appeal. The decision was in favor of the applicant for the waiver of pre-deposit, considering the debatable nature of whether the tax deducted at source by NHAI should be included in the gross amount for Service Tax liability. The Tribunal noted that the applicant had already paid Service Tax on the billed amount for services rendered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>