<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1065 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of common facilities charges, royalty payments, and travelling expenses. The disallowance of professional and consultancy charges was remitted back to the AO for further assessment due to lack of specific details. The Tribunal stressed the necessity of determining fair market value for disallowances under section 40A(2)(b). The AO&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1065 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance of common facilities charges, royalty payments, and travelling expenses. The disallowance of professional and consultancy charges was remitted back to the AO for further assessment due to lack of specific details. The Tribunal stressed the necessity of determining fair market value for disallowances under section 40A(2)(b). The AO&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>