<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1024 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178751</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of royalty payment under section 40(a)(ia) for the assessment year 2008-09 due to failure to deduct tax at source. However, the disallowance of depreciation claimed by the assessee was set aside as the processing units were deemed in use once handed over to Sea Food Exporters, regardless of their utilization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1024 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178751</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of royalty payment under section 40(a)(ia) for the assessment year 2008-09 due to failure to deduct tax at source. However, the disallowance of depreciation claimed by the assessee was set aside as the processing units were deemed in use once handed over to Sea Food Exporters, regardless of their utilization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>