<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 934 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178755</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the non-compete fee paid by the assessee qualifies as a business or commercial right under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, allowing for depreciation. The Court interpreted the term broadly to include rights enhancing business efficiency, such as non-compete agreements. Relying on precedents, the Court affirmed that non-compete fees are intangible assets eligible for depreciation, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:05:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 934 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178755</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the non-compete fee paid by the assessee qualifies as a business or commercial right under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, allowing for depreciation. The Court interpreted the term broadly to include rights enhancing business efficiency, such as non-compete agreements. Relying on precedents, the Court affirmed that non-compete fees are intangible assets eligible for depreciation, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>