<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 376 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decisions on all issues related to disallowances under the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the importance of following legal precedents and requiring concrete evidence for disallowances. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the decisions made by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The order was issued on January 8, 2016, in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 376 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decisions on all issues related to disallowances under the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the importance of following legal precedents and requiring concrete evidence for disallowances. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the decisions made by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The order was issued on January 8, 2016, in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>