<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against an order allowing a refund of service tax to the appellant. It was determined that the appellant, despite not directly paying the service tax, had borne the burden as it was recovered from another entity&#039;s refunds. The Tribunal found that the appellant was eligible for the refund under the exemption order, emphasizing that the mode of refund (cash or adjustment) was not decisive. The decision highlighted the recovery process and exemption order, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 370 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal against an order allowing a refund of service tax to the appellant. It was determined that the appellant, despite not directly paying the service tax, had borne the burden as it was recovered from another entity&#039;s refunds. The Tribunal found that the appellant was eligible for the refund under the exemption order, emphasizing that the mode of refund (cash or adjustment) was not decisive. The decision highlighted the recovery process and exemption order, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>