<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 360 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271655</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision to allow the refund claimed by the textile company, emphasizing the correct application of depreciation rates and alignment with relevant circulars and notifications. The judgment provided clarity on the eligibility for depreciation on capital goods and the interpretation of legal provisions governing duty exemptions in cases of conversion from Export Oriented Units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 360 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271655</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the decision to allow the refund claimed by the textile company, emphasizing the correct application of depreciation rates and alignment with relevant circulars and notifications. The judgment provided clarity on the eligibility for depreciation on capital goods and the interpretation of legal provisions governing duty exemptions in cases of conversion from Export Oriented Units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>