<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 514 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178748</link>
    <description>Profit arising from the sale of land after plotting it to obtain a better price does not, by itself, amount to an adventure in the nature of trade. Following an earlier Allahabad HC decision, the court treated the activity as a capital transaction rather than trading activity and held that the resulting profit was not taxable as business profit from an adventure in the nature of trade. The reference was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 514 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178748</link>
      <description>Profit arising from the sale of land after plotting it to obtain a better price does not, by itself, amount to an adventure in the nature of trade. Following an earlier Allahabad HC decision, the court treated the activity as a capital transaction rather than trading activity and held that the resulting profit was not taxable as business profit from an adventure in the nature of trade. The reference was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>