<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1369 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178743</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, ruling in favor of the assessee on various disallowances including payment by pay order under Section 40A(3), salary expenses, ad hoc expenses, chit fund loss, and business promotion expenses. The disallowance of Diwali incentives was dismissed as not pressed. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s compliance with providing evidence and past practices in allowing the expenses. The decision was announced on 21.1.11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:25:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1369 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178743</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, ruling in favor of the assessee on various disallowances including payment by pay order under Section 40A(3), salary expenses, ad hoc expenses, chit fund loss, and business promotion expenses. The disallowance of Diwali incentives was dismissed as not pressed. The Tribunal emphasized the assessee&#039;s compliance with providing evidence and past practices in allowing the expenses. The decision was announced on 21.1.11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>