https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178738 The revision power under section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 does not extend to an appellate order made by the State Government through a duly delegated officer under section 21(4), because such an order is in law the Government's own order and not one passed by an officer in his own right. Treating it as revisable would undermine finality in consolidation proceedings. An order without jurisdiction that inevitably deprives a person of allotted property can also be challenged under Article 32, since a serious and inevitable threat to the fundamental right to property is sufficient to attract constitutional relief. en-us Wed, 10 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:46:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178738 The revision power under section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 does not extend to an appellate order made by the State Government through a duly delegated officer under section 21(4), because such an order is in law the Government's own order and not one passed by an officer in his own right. Treating it as revisable would undermine finality in consolidation proceedings. An order without jurisdiction that inevitably deprives a person of allotted property can also be challenged under Article 32, since a serious and inevitable threat to the fundamental right to property is sufficient to attract constitutional relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178738