<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1939 (12) TMI 2 - RANGOON HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178735</link>
    <description>A partnership firm is treated as no separate legal personality apart from the partners who constitute it for income-tax purposes. Legal expenses incurred in defending partners and a manager against criminal charges were not deductible because they were not shown to have been incurred solely for earning profits; the expenditure also served to protect the personal position and reputation of the accused individuals. The same amount was not allowable as a business loss either, because money spent on defending criminal proceedings and achieving acquittal was not a loss in the ordinary trading sense. The note therefore distinguishes the firm&#039;s non-separate status from the separate tax treatment of defence costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:04:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1939 (12) TMI 2 - RANGOON HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178735</link>
      <description>A partnership firm is treated as no separate legal personality apart from the partners who constitute it for income-tax purposes. Legal expenses incurred in defending partners and a manager against criminal charges were not deductible because they were not shown to have been incurred solely for earning profits; the expenditure also served to protect the personal position and reputation of the accused individuals. The same amount was not allowable as a business loss either, because money spent on defending criminal proceedings and achieving acquittal was not a loss in the ordinary trading sense. The note therefore distinguishes the firm&#039;s non-separate status from the separate tax treatment of defence costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>