<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 50 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2247</link>
    <description>The High Court held that COD clearance is not necessary for appeals involving non-residents represented by public sector undertakings. The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the appeal for lack of COD clearance, directing the Tribunal to consider the case on its merits. The decision favored the Revenue, emphasizing that COD approval is only mandatory for disputes between government entities and public sector undertakings, not for private entities or non-residents represented by public sector undertakings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2016 13:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 50 - HIGH COURT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2247</link>
      <description>The High Court held that COD clearance is not necessary for appeals involving non-residents represented by public sector undertakings. The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s dismissal of the appeal for lack of COD clearance, directing the Tribunal to consider the case on its merits. The decision favored the Revenue, emphasizing that COD approval is only mandatory for disputes between government entities and public sector undertakings, not for private entities or non-residents represented by public sector undertakings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>