<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 812 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178713</link>
    <description>The court determined that income from the sale of land should be classified as capital gains rather than business income. The respondent company held the land as an investment for 10 years without development, leading to the profit being taxable under capital gains. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld as the revenue did not challenge the factual findings. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 812 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178713</link>
      <description>The court determined that income from the sale of land should be classified as capital gains rather than business income. The respondent company held the land as an investment for 10 years without development, leading to the profit being taxable under capital gains. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld as the revenue did not challenge the factual findings. The appeal by the revenue was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>