<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1254 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178709</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of the seized foreign currency under Sections 113(d) and (h) of the Customs Act, 1962, amounting to Rs. 1,25,22,780. The penalties imposed on the appellants were reduced significantly, with Sri. Suresh Gangaram Hole&#039;s penalty reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs, Sri. Rajendra Butada&#039;s to Rs. 25 lakhs, and Smt. Bharati Butada&#039;s to Rs. 1 lakh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:14:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1254 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178709</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of the seized foreign currency under Sections 113(d) and (h) of the Customs Act, 1962, amounting to Rs. 1,25,22,780. The penalties imposed on the appellants were reduced significantly, with Sri. Suresh Gangaram Hole&#039;s penalty reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs, Sri. Rajendra Butada&#039;s to Rs. 25 lakhs, and Smt. Bharati Butada&#039;s to Rs. 1 lakh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>