<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 352 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271647</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld additions under section 69C of the Income Tax Act due to unexplained expenditure, confirmed by the Commissioner. However, it reversed the decision on additional depreciation for windmills installed by the assessee, granting entitlement to depreciation under section 32 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:13:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 352 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271647</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld additions under section 69C of the Income Tax Act due to unexplained expenditure, confirmed by the Commissioner. However, it reversed the decision on additional depreciation for windmills installed by the assessee, granting entitlement to depreciation under section 32 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>