<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 336 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271631</link>
    <description>Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules excludes outdoor catering and life insurance services when they are used primarily for employees&#039; personal use or consumption. On the facts stated, these services were taken for employees&#039; personal benefit and no direct nexus with the output service was shown. Cenvat credit was therefore not admissible on the service tax paid for those services, and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 336 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271631</link>
      <description>Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules excludes outdoor catering and life insurance services when they are used primarily for employees&#039; personal use or consumption. On the facts stated, these services were taken for employees&#039; personal benefit and no direct nexus with the output service was shown. Cenvat credit was therefore not admissible on the service tax paid for those services, and the disallowance was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>