<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 333 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271628</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appellant&#039;s appeal due to the unjustified delay in filing and the lack of legal basis for seeking modification before the first appellate authority. The decision was based on the specific facts of the case and the absence of provisions allowing for such actions in the given legal framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:11:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 333 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271628</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appellant&#039;s appeal due to the unjustified delay in filing and the lack of legal basis for seeking modification before the first appellate authority. The decision was based on the specific facts of the case and the absence of provisions allowing for such actions in the given legal framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>