<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 322 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271617</link>
    <description>The court issued a notice restraining the Assistant Commissioner from proceeding with the hearing on demand notices for customs duties until further orders. It directed that no action should be taken on the recovery of customs duties and interests pending a decision on the extension of the warehousing period for imported machinery. The court agreed with the petitioner&#039;s argument that seeking an extension might not be necessary under certain sections of the Customs Act, 1962, and emphasized the importance of considering the specific circumstances of the case to prevent immediate adverse consequences to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 322 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271617</link>
      <description>The court issued a notice restraining the Assistant Commissioner from proceeding with the hearing on demand notices for customs duties until further orders. It directed that no action should be taken on the recovery of customs duties and interests pending a decision on the extension of the warehousing period for imported machinery. The court agreed with the petitioner&#039;s argument that seeking an extension might not be necessary under certain sections of the Customs Act, 1962, and emphasized the importance of considering the specific circumstances of the case to prevent immediate adverse consequences to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>