<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 318 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271613</link>
    <description>The court set aside the default assessment notices and penalty, emphasizing the lack of natural justice principles in the case. It found the system-generated orders invalid and highlighted the need for human interface in such processes. The court directed a de novo assessment by the VATO, allowing the petitioner to present its case adequately. The rejection of C-Forms without a hearing was deemed improper, and the court ordered reconsideration with proper procedures. The court emphasized the importance of providing a fair opportunity to the petitioner and set strict timelines for the reassessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 01:10:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 318 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271613</link>
      <description>The court set aside the default assessment notices and penalty, emphasizing the lack of natural justice principles in the case. It found the system-generated orders invalid and highlighted the need for human interface in such processes. The court directed a de novo assessment by the VATO, allowing the petitioner to present its case adequately. The rejection of C-Forms without a hearing was deemed improper, and the court ordered reconsideration with proper procedures. The court emphasized the importance of providing a fair opportunity to the petitioner and set strict timelines for the reassessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>