<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 669 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178676</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the plot size met the requirements for deduction u/s 80IB(10). It was established that the project was completed within the prescribed time limit, with the completion certificate for a different project being irrelevant. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for various assessment years, concluding that the projects satisfied the necessary criteria for deduction, leading to the dismissal of all appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:00:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 669 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178676</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the plot size met the requirements for deduction u/s 80IB(10). It was established that the project was completed within the prescribed time limit, with the completion certificate for a different project being irrelevant. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for various assessment years, concluding that the projects satisfied the necessary criteria for deduction, leading to the dismissal of all appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=178676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>