<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Central Sales tax (CST) query</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109854</link>
    <description>The discussion explains that CST is not Cenvatable because allowing Cenvat on CST would defeat the purpose of the CST levy; CST is a central levy though retained by states, while VAT is a state subject, so cross-credit between central and state taxes is legally and administratively unjustifiable. Respondents also observe that concessional treatment on inter-state purchases operates like a de facto credit, and that a unified regime such as GST would change these mechanics.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:05:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=416032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Central Sales tax (CST) query</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109854</link>
      <description>The discussion explains that CST is not Cenvatable because allowing Cenvat on CST would defeat the purpose of the CST levy; CST is a central levy though retained by states, while VAT is a state subject, so cross-credit between central and state taxes is legally and administratively unjustifiable. Respondents also observe that concessional treatment on inter-state purchases operates like a de facto credit, and that a unified regime such as GST would change these mechanics.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2016 13:05:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=109854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>